Do you ever feel like our profession goes around in circles with the issues we face?  We talk about a major issue, it creates all kinds of sound and fury, it goes away for a while and then returns?  The SEC’s consideration of IFRS for domestic issuers is an issue that has been “going around” for years.    The FASB’s projects on leases, financial instruments, and revenue recognition are not the first time the board has addressed these areas.

I think one of the theme songs of our profession could be Joni Mitchell’s “Circle Game”:

“We can’t return, we can only look behind from where we came, and go round and round and round in the circle game”

(BTW, here is a great youtube video of her performing the song live: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbIuC9hTY9Y&feature=kp )

I think the number of times an issue goes around this circle is directly related to complexity and the level of controversy it creates.

One hugely controversial and complex issue which many hope will move to the low end of the cycle is mandatory auditor rotation.

The PCAOB moved auditor rotation to the high end of the cycle back in August of 2011 with its Concept Release on Auditor Independence and Audit Firm Rotation.  While it was only a concept release it stirred enormous discussion and controversy.  Congress even got involved with the House passing a bill, although no Senate action occurred.

We have all been going round and round the auditor rotation circle.

As we come around the circle this month, the latest news on this front is that in the SEC’s hearings about the PCAOB’s budget last Thursday, in response to a question from Commissioner Gallagher, PCAOB chairman James Doty told the SEC:

“We don’t have an active project or work going on within the board to move forward on a term limit for auditors or mandatory rotation project.  It is not part of the budget – not budgeted in what you are approving today.”

However, Doty added, the PCAOB would “continue to think about what impacts independence.”

(BTW, you can listen to the recorded video webcast at: http://www.sec.gov/news/openmeetings/2014/020514openmeeting.shtml It is entertaining and suspenseful as, …, well, I am not sure what, but you should try it once!)

Perhaps this means that for the time being we will not be seeing any action on this front, at least for a while!

I suppose that this is not the last time this issue will come around.  As you may have heard, the EU is moving forward with a rotation proposal.

Considering how all this works, maybe the theme song should be “The Wheels on the Bus go Round and Round….”

Many years ago, when I was a young boy (and yes, this was MANY years ago), I watched a TV show called The Jetsons.  The show featured a family in the future, and one of the coolest things about them was that their car flew!  I assumed that by the time the 21^st Century started, we would all have flying cars!  Well, I am still waiting, and kind of disappointed. Seriously, every time I am stuck in traffic I ask, “Where is my flying car?”

As challenging as the flying car wait has been, I am not sure if the wait for the FASB and IASB’s new revenue recognition standard has been any easier!  We have seen this project on the FASB’s agenda for over a decade, and I have to say, as an accounting geek, I am not sure which I am really more excited about, this new standard, or my flying car…

It is understandable why this new standard is taking so long.  The scope of the project is immense and the challenge of finding a model that applies to all types and forms of revenue is enormous.  And in the end, we will all likely be very glad that this project has been done without undue rush and with due care.

Thankfully, with the effective date of periods beginning after December 15, 2016 for public companies (periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for private companies), we will have time to plan and implement the new standard.

So, here are a few heads-up issues to think about as we wait for the final standard to be issued sometime soon!

1.  A key point to see is that this guidance supersedes virtually all existing revenue recognition guidance, including software and percentage of completion revenue recognition standards in effect today.  The new five-step contract-based model will require all companies to analyze whether and how the new standard will affect your revenue recognition.

2.  Even if the new standard does not change much about the way you recognize revenue, it will affect you.  Implementing the new disclosures will require significant work, and given the SEC’s focus on revenue disclosures, disaggregation of revenues and MD&A disclosures about revenues, both the notes to the financial statements and MD&A will be affected.

3.  For counsel, the form of revenue related contracts might need to be revised to better fit into the five-step contact based mode in the standard.

4.  We will all be learning a lot as discussion of the new standard evolves, and the FASB/IASB task force to deal with implementation issues will be a process to watch.

So, watch for the excitement of the new standard.  Our workshops and conferences to help you deal with it will be announced soon.  And, let’s hope for news on the flying car front soon also!