Category Archives: Reporting

An SEC Comment Challenge: Find the Non-GAAP Measure Issue – Post Three

In this series of posts we are focusing on non-GAAP measure problems and related SEC comments.  As the first and second posts in this series did, this post gives you an opportunity to see if you can spot the issue, and then provides the background and SEC guidance behind the issue.

As a brief reminder, the SEC’s guidance about the use of non-GAAP measures is primarily in three places:

Regulation G for non-GAAP measures used anywhere,

S-K Item 10(e), for non-GAAP measures in filed documents, and

The related Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations.

 Just like the first and second posts in this series, you can read the excerpt of the release behind the comment and try to spot the issue.  If you prefer, you can read straight through to the comment and explanation that follow.

These excerpts are from Papa John’s International, Inc’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019.  Can you spot the non-GAAP issue?  As you review this information, focus your thoughts on the “special charges” and in particular the “Marketing fund investments.”

To begin, here is one of the non-GAAP measures presented by Papa John’s:

PapaJohn One

Papa John’s also provided this detail about the special charges:

PapaJohn Two

As you review the list of non-GAAP adjustments, letter (b) regarding marketing support to franchisees seems like it is a cash expense.

This is the comment the SEC issued about this non-GAAP adjustment:

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2019

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Items Impacting Comparability; Non-GAAP Measures, page 40

  1. Please tell us the consideration you gave to Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations in adjusting your non-GAAP measures to remove marketing fund investments made by you.

The C&DI referenced, Question 100.01 makes a very important point:

Question 100.01

Question: Can certain adjustments, although not explicitly prohibited, result in a non-GAAP measure that is misleading?

Answer: Yes. Certain adjustments may violate Rule 100(b) of Regulation G because they cause the presentation of the non-GAAP measure to be misleading. For example, presenting a performance measure that excludes normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate a registrant’s business could be misleading. [May 17, 2016]

This is Papa John’s first of two responses to this comment:

We did consider the guidance in Question 100.01 of the Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations in our presentation of our adjusted (non-GAAP) financial results excluding marketing fund investments identified as “Special charges.” The marketing fund investments included in “Special charges” of $27.5 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 29, 2019 and December 30, 2018, respectively, represent discretionary, non-contractual marketing fund investments to support national media initiatives. Domestic Company-owned and franchised Papa John’s restaurants are required to contribute a certain minimum percentage of their sales (currently 5.0% of sales) to the Papa John’s Marketing Fund, our national marketing fund, which are not included as part of the “Special charges.” The national marketing fund is responsible for developing and conducting marketing and advertising for the domestic Papa John’s system. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company began making significant discretionary, non-contractual marketing fund investments to supplement the contractual Company-owned and franchised restaurant-level system contributions.  These discretionary, non-contractual marketing fund investments were part of the Company’s previously announced program of increased support and financial assistance to the North America franchise system in response to the severe decline in North America sales. The decline in North America sales followed extensive negative publicity and consumer sentiment as a result of statements by the Company’s founder and former spokesman in late 2017 and July 2018. The discretionary, non-contractual marketing fund investments were made as a response to these extraordinary adverse events to defend and repair the brand’s reputation and were not made in the ordinary course of business.

Question 100.01 notes that a non-GAAP financial measure may be misleading if it excludes “normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate a registrant’s business.” The Company does not consider the incremental marketing fund investments to be normal, recurring, cash operating expenses necessary to operate the Company’s business. Furthermore, as stated in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2019, such investments are of a limited duration and are only “expected to continue through the third quarter of 2020”, which further supports the conclusion that the charges are not of a recurring nature. As a result, we do not consider these investments to be representative of our underlying operating performance and thus believe the exclusion in our non-GAAP financial results provides investors with important additional information regarding our underlying operating results and is important for purposes of comparisons to prior year results.  In addition, management uses the non-GAAP financial results to evaluate the Company’s underlying operating performance and to analyze trends. Accordingly, we respectfully advise the staff that we considered the guidance in Question 100.01 and believe that the exclusion of the discretionary marketing fund investments from our non-GAAP financial results and the related presentation and disclosure does not cause those results to be misleading.

To help further clarify the nature of these charges, beginning in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2020, we will revise the footnoted description of these marketing fund investments in our “Special charges” table as follows: “Represents incremental discretionary marketing fund investments in excess of contractual Company-owned restaurant-level contributions, which were made as part of our previously announced temporary support package to our franchisees.”

After this first response the SEC and Papa John’s had further phone discussions about this issue.  Interestingly, the SEC did not issue a second comment letter.  While we cannot know the content of these discussions, they were clearly substantive.  They resulted in this final answer by Papa John’s:

Response: As discussed during the phone conversation between the Staff and the Company on April 24, 2020, beginning with the Company’s earnings release for the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company will no longer present adjusted (non-GAAP) financial results excluding the marketing fund investments made by the Company.

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

Our New, Virtual, Interactive Form 10-K Disclosure Workshop

Our new SEC 10-K Disclosure Best Practices Workshop is a perfect way to help you prepare for this year-end’s unique and complex reporting challenges.  Featured topics include COVID-19 related disclosures, the SEC’s modernization of business, risk factor and legal proceedings disclosures, rules and practice issues surrounding the use of non-GAAP measures and SEC “hot-button” comment areas in the current environment.  Best practice examples from different industries and companies are discussed in each section to illustrate effective disclosure practices.

Featuring open discussion in an interactive, Zoom-based format, this new Workshop will be presented over two afternoons (half days) on October 5_6, 2020, with a start time of 1 p.m. EDT on both days.

The Workshop includes online access to PLI’s SEC Reporting Handbook.

 As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome.

The SEC’s Updated RegFlex Agenda

As we blogged about here, SEC Chairman Clayton has worked to make the SEC’s Regulatory Flexibility Act agenda a document that reflects the Commission’s short-term plans as opposed to a kind of regulatory “wish list.”  The latest update (known as the Spring version) was published at the end of June and provides a view of how the Commission intends to move forward with many significant initiatives despite the disruption of COVID-19.  Among the projects on the short-term agenda are:

  • Modernization and Simplification of Disclosures of Regulation S-K Items 101, 103, and 105
  • Modernization and Simplification of Disclosures Regarding MD&A, Selected Financial Data and Supplementary Financial Information
  • Universal Proxy
  • Amendments to Exemptions From the Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice
  • Harmonization of Exempt Offerings
  • Update of Statistical Disclosures for Bank and Savings and Loan Registrants
  • Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers

You can review all the proposed rule and final rule stage projects on the short-term agenda here.  As you will see the above projects are only part of what the Commission intends to accomplish in the short term.

You can also view the long-term agenda here.

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

A New Format and Approach for Inspection Reports

In his speech “Seeing Through the Regulatory Looking Glass: PCAOB Inspection Reports” (which includes a delightful number of Alice in Wonderland references!), PCAOB Board Member J. Robert Brown Jr. explores historical decisions the Board made about the content and structure of inspection reports.  He then describes changes the current Board is making to these reports in their process of increasing transparency, including:

  • Use of plain English
  • Less jargon
  • Providing an executive summary
  • Including comparative charts and tables

In addition the Board is now grouping findings into three categories:

  • Findings that included an accounting violation
  • Audits with multiple deficiencies
  • Audits with a single deficiency

The Board has also added a new section to its inspection reports describing deficiencies that were not previously disclosed.  These deficiencies did not affect the sufficiency of audit evidence but were, nonetheless, areas where firms did not comply with audit standards.  An example would be failure to complete and “lock down” audit workpapers within the appropriate time frame.

Mr. Brown’s speech also discusses areas where the Board might consider additional changes to inspection reports.

The new inspection report format has been used for six reports as of July 27, 2020.  You can review these reports here.

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

An SEC Professionals Group Webinar

On June 18, 2020, Alyson Claybaugh from Intelligize and George Wilson from SEC Institute are co-presenting a webinar for  the SEC Professionals Group about the SEC’s Disclosure Modernization and Simplification process and COVID-19 related disclosure challenges.  There is no cost for the program which also provides one hour of CPE credit.

You can learn more about the webinar and the SEC Professionals Group here, including the special events they organize for members such as their weekly informal “Corona Conversations.”

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

The SEC Marches Forward with its Disclosure Effectiveness Program

Despite the disruption caused by COVID-19, the SEC has continued to move forward with its disclosure effectiveness program.  Along with its Final Rules in March which amended the definition of accelerated filerand the requirements of guarantor/guarantee financial statements, the SEC has now updated its guidance for information about business acquisitions and dispositions.

On May 20, 2020, the SEC adopted a Final Rule updating the 30-year-old requirements for financial statements and proforma information about acquisitions and dispositions.  The changes include an update to the significant subsidiary test in Regulation S-X Rule 1.02(w) and changes to S-X Rule 3.05’s requirements for the periods for financial statements to be presented for acquired businesses.

The changes to the significant subsidiary tests in Rule 1-02(w), which is also in Securities Act Rule 405 and Exchange Act Rule 12b-2, include:

  • “revising the investment test to compare the investments in and advances to the acquired or disposed business to the company’s aggregate worldwide market value if available;
  • revising the income test by adding a revenue component;
  • expanding the use of pro forma financial information in measuring significance; and
  • conforming, to the extent applicable, the significance threshold and tests for disposed businesses to those used for acquired businesses.”

The revisions to Rule 3.05 reduce the maximum number of periods financial statements of an acquired business may be required to two years.

The Final Rule also changes the requirements for proforma financial information to provide for three kinds of proforma adjustments:

  • “Transaction Accounting Adjustments” reflecting the application of required accounting;
  • “Autonomous Entity Adjustments” to present the company as an autonomous entity if it was previously part of another entity; and
  • optional “Management’s Adjustments” depicting synergies and dis-synergies.

“Management’s Adjustments” may be presented if, in management’s opinion, such adjustments would “enhance an understanding of the pro forma effects of the transaction and certain conditions related to the basis and the form of presentation are met.”

The Final Rule includes a number of related changes and you can read all the details here.

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

First Quarter COVID-19 Disclosure Examples – Part Two

In our last post we started a series to explore examples of disclosures companies have made to address issues raised by COVID-19 in their first quarter 2020 Form 10-Q’s.

This second example is from Alphabet’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.  Unlike Starbucks, who put all their COVID-19 related financial statement disclosures in one footnote, Alphabet included disclosure as appropriate in relevant footnotes.

First, here is an addition Alphabet made in their 1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act safe harbor meaningful cautionary statements:

Note About Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include, among other things, statements regarding:

  • the effect of the novel coronavirus pandemic (“COVID-19”) on our business, operations, and financial results, including the effect of governmental lockdowns, restrictions and new regulations on our operations and processes;

In the notes to the quarterly financial statements this language was added to the Use of Estimates section:

Use of Estimates

………

As of March 31, 2020, the impact of the outbreak of COVID-19 continues to unfold. As a result, many of our estimates and assumptions required increased judgment and carry a higher degree of variability and volatility. As events continue to evolve and additional information becomes available, our estimates may change materially in future periods.

 In their discussion of the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable Alphabet added the bolded language below to their disclosure:

Accounts Receivable

Our payment terms for accounts receivable vary by the type and location of our customer and the products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. For certain products or services and customers, we require payment before the products or services are delivered to the customer.

We maintain an allowance for credit losses for expected uncollectible accounts receivable, which is recorded as an offset to accounts receivable and changes in such are classified as general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We assess collectibility by reviewing accounts receivable on a collective basis where similar characteristics exist and on an individual basis when we identify specific customers with known disputes or collectibility issues. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses, we consider historical collectibility based on past due status and make judgments about the creditworthiness of customers based on ongoing credit evaluations. We also consider customer-specific information, current market conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions to inform adjustments to historical loss data.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020, our assessment considered business and market disruptions caused by COVID-19 and estimates of expected emerging credit and collectibility trends. The continued volatility in market conditions and evolving shifts in credit trends are difficult to predict causing variability and volatility that may have a material impact on our allowance for credit losses in future periods. The allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable was $275 million and $717 million as of December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020, respectively.

In their disclosure about equity investment Alphabet added COVID-19 considerations in the bolded language below:

Equity Investments

The following discusses our marketable equity securities, non-marketable equity securities, gains and losses on marketable and non-marketable equity securities, as well as our equity securities accounted for under the equity method.

Our marketable equity securities are publicly traded stocks or funds measured at fair value and classified within Level 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy because we use quoted prices for identical assets in active markets or inputs that are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets. All gains and losses on marketable equity securities, realized and unrealized, are recognized in other income (expense), net.

Our non-marketable equity securities are investments in privately held companies without readily determinable market values. The carrying value of our non-marketable equity securities is adjusted to fair value for observable transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer or impairment (referred to as the measurement alternative). We qualitatively assess whether indicators of impairment exist. Factors considered in our assessment include the companies’ financial and liquidity position, access to capital resources, exposure to industries and markets impacted by COVID-19, and the time since the last adjustment to fair value, among others. If the assessment indicates that the investment is impaired, we estimate the fair value by using the best information available, which may include cash flow projections or other available market data. The effect of COVID-19 on our impairment assessment requires significant judgment due to the uncertainty around the impact.

Alphabet addressed COVID-19’s impact on taxes:

Note 14. Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was lower than the U.S. federal statutory rate, primarily due to the U.S. Research and Development Tax Credit, the Foreign-Derived Intangible Income tax benefit, and stock-based compensation related tax benefits. Our effective tax rate is based on forecasted annual results which may fluctuate significantly through the rest of the year, in particular due to the uncertainty in our annual forecasts resulting from the unpredictable impact of COVID-19 on our operating results.

Lastly, Alphabet added the following to the introduction to their MD&A:

The Impact of COVID-19 on our Results and Operations

In late 2019, an outbreak of COVID-19 emerged and by March 11, 2020 was declared a global pandemic by The World Health Organization. Across the United States and the world, governments and municipalities instituted measures in an effort to control the spread of COVID-19, including quarantines, shelter-in-place orders, school closings, travel restrictions and the closure of non-essential businesses. By the end of March, the macroeconomic impacts became significant, exhibited by, among other things, a rise in unemployment and market volatility.

For most of the quarter ended March 31, 2020, our results reflect historical trends and seasonality. However, in March 2020 we experienced a decline in advertising revenues due to the impact of COVID-19 and the related reductions in global economic activity. While users’ search activity increased, their interests shifted to less commercial topics. In addition, our advertising revenues were negatively affected by reduced spending by our advertisers in response to the macroeconomic impact.

We also assessed the realized and potential credit deterioration of our customers due to changes in the macroeconomic environment, which has been reflected in an increase in our allowance for credit losses for accounts receivable. In addition, we experienced declines in the valuation of our equity investments.

Looking ahead, the full impact of COVID-19 on our business is unknown and highly unpredictable. Our past results may not be indicative of our future performance and historical trends in revenues, operating income, operating margin, net income, EPS, among others, may differ materially. For example, to the extent the pandemic continues to disrupt economic activity globally we, like other businesses, would not be immune as it could adversely affect our business, operations and financial results through prolonged decreases in advertising spend, credit deterioration of our customers, depressed economic activity, or declines in capital markets. In addition, many of our expenses are less variable in nature and may not correlate to changes in revenues. The extent of the impact will depend on a number of factors, including the duration and severity of the pandemic; advances in testing, treatment and prevention; and the macroeconomic impact of government measures to contain the spread of the virus and related government stimulus measures.

To address the potential impact to our business, over the near-term, we are reevaluating the pace of our investment plans, including, but not limited to, our hiring, investments in data centers, servers, network equipment, real estate and facilities, and marketing and travel spending, as well as taking certain measures to support our customers.

Within MD&A Alphabet also addressed the impact of COVID-19 on various operating units:

Google advertising revenues

In addition to the impact of COVID-19, our advertising revenue growth, as well as the change in paid clicks and cost-per-click on Google properties and the change in impressions and cost-per-impression on Google Network Members’ properties and the correlation between these items, have been affected and may continue to be affected by various factors, including:

  • advertiser competition for keywords;
  • changes in advertising quality, formats, delivery or policy;
  • changes in device mix;
  • changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
  • fees advertisers are willing to pay based on how they manage their advertising costs;
  • general economic conditions;
  • seasonality; and
  • traffic growth in emerging markets compared to more mature markets and across various advertising verticals and channels.

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

First Quarter COVID-19 Disclosure Examples – Part One

Now that first quarter 2020 Form 10-Q’s have been filed, companies have made COVID-19 disclosures addressing issues ranging from asset impairments to the CARES Act.  In this series of blog posts we hope to help you as you deal with the evolution of these disclosures by reviewing how some companies approached these challenging issues.

This first example is from Starbuck’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2020.  It is very lengthy.  The company grouped all its COVID-19 disclosures in this single financial statement footnote.  It includes:

 An overview of the situation

A summary of the impact on operations

Long-lived asset impairment discussion

Goodwill impairment considerations

Other asset impairment issues

Rent concession discussion

Deferred tax asset recoverability analysis

CARES Act overview

Discussion and emphasis of uncertainties in future periods

 You will also see that it includes disclosure that sounds like MD&A.  It is interesting that this risk-based disclosure is in the financial statements and that all Starbuck’s COVID-19 impacts were included in this single note rather than being addressed in individual notes for each accounting area.

Note 1

_________

COVID-19

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (“COVID-19“) was first identified, and in March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized COVID-19 as a pandemic. To help control the spread of the virus and protect the health and safety of our partners (employees) and customers, we began temporarily closing or modifying operating models and hours of our retail stores in many markets both in response to governmental requirements and voluntarily, beyond the requirements of local authorities, during the second quarter of fiscal 2020.

Changes made in our operations, combined with reduced customer traffic, resulted in material reductions in revenues and operating income during the second quarter of fiscal 2020, which prompted us to update our impairment analyses of our company-operated retail store portfolios and related lease right-of-use assets. For certain lower-performing stores, we compared the carrying value of store assets to undiscounted cash flows with updated assumptions on near-term profitability. As a result, we recorded an immaterial asset impairment charge within store operating expenses on our consolidated statement of earnings during the quarter ended March 29, 2020.

We also evaluated our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets at the end of the fiscal second quarter. Our most recently completed goodwill impairment analyses indicated significant excess fair values over carrying values across the different reporting units. Since we expect the negative financial impacts from the outbreak to be temporary, they do not significantly affect the assumptions underpinning our long-term revenue and cash flow growth rates, operating models and business strategies. Therefore, we do not consider the outbreak to be a triggering event to accelerate our annual goodwill impairment analysis. As a result, no impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were recorded during the quarter.

We evaluated our remaining assets, particularly accounts receivable and inventory. Our accounts receivable are mainly comprised of net unpaid invoices for product sales to and royalties from our licensees. Our allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated based on historical experience, licensee credit risk and application of the specific identification method. We also assessed incremental risks due to COVID-19 on our licensees’ financial viability. To assist our international licensed partners during the outbreak, we provided a short-term payment extension for their outstanding receivables as of the end of the fiscal second quarter. We do not believe the form and length of the extension changed our revenue recognition policy or had a significant impact to future collectability. Based on these actions during the quarter ended March 29, 2020, we did not observe a significant deterioration of our receivable portfolio to warrant a significant increase in bad debt expense. We will continue to monitor our accounts receivable as we also committed to providing other forms of relief to certain licensees during the third quarter of fiscal 2020, which may reduce our revenues.

Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost (primarily moving average cost) or net realizable value. We record reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory and for estimated shrinkage between physical inventory counts. During the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2020, we recorded significant inventory write-offs due to expired or the expected expiration of perishable ingredients and products as a result of excess inventory due to the temporary closure of our retail stores. See Note 5, Inventories, for additional details. Depending on the pace of reopening of company-operated stores as well as future customer behaviors, among other factors, we may incur additional inventory write-offs during the third quarter of fiscal 2020.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2020, we received an immaterial amount of COVID-19-related rent concessions for certain stores in China, generally correlating with the limited time period our stores were closed during stay-at-home mandates. Consistent with updated guidance from the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in April 2020, we have elected to treat COVID-19-related rent concessions as variable rent. While we are having ongoing conversations with landlords in various markets in seeking commercially reasonable lease concessions given the current environment, we have not yet confirmed significant concessions for the remainder of the year.

On March 27, 2020, the U.S. government enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which among other things, provides employer payroll tax credits for wages paid to employees who are unable to work during the COVID-19 outbreak and options to defer payroll tax payments. Based on our preliminary evaluation of the CARES Act, we qualify for certain employer payroll tax credits as well as the deferral of payroll and other tax payments in the future, which will be treated as government subsidies to offset relating operating expenses. During the quarter ended March 29, 2020, the qualified payroll tax credits reduced our store operating expenses by approximately $35 million on our consolidated statement of earnings. We expect to record additional payroll tax credits from the U.S. and other governments primarily in our fiscal third quarter to offset qualified wages paid to our partners. We intend to defer qualified payroll and other tax payments as permitted by the CARES Act.

We recorded our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and related liabilities based on management’s best estimates. Additionally, we assessed the likelihood of realizing the benefits of our deferred tax assets. As of the end of the fiscal quarter, we did not record significant valuation allowance adjustments based on available evidence. However, we will continue to monitor the realizability of our deferred tax assets, particularly in certain foreign jurisdictions where the outbreak has started to create significant net operating losses. Our ability to recover these deferred tax assets depends on several factors, including our results of operations and our ability to project future taxable income in those jurisdictions. If we determine that some portion of the tax benefit will not be realized, we would record a valuation allowance, which would increase our income tax expense. Total deferred tax assets as of the end of the fiscal second quarter were approximately $1.7 billion, of which approximately $100 million related to foreign jurisdictions where we expect to incur significant net operating losses in the near term, although the risks of failing to realize these benefits vary across the jurisdictions.

The COVID-19 pandemic remains a rapidly evolving situation. The continuation of the outbreak may cause prolonged periods of store closures and modified operating schedules and may result in changes in customer behaviors, including a potential reduction in consumer discretionary spending in our company-operated and licensed stores. These may lead to increased asset recovery and valuation risks, such as impairment of our company-operated store and other assets and an inability to realize deferred tax assets due to sustaining losses in certain jurisdictions. The uncertainties in the global economy will likely impact the financial viability of our suppliers, licensees and other business partners, which may interrupt our supply chain, limit our ability to collect receivables and require other changes to our operations. These and other factors will adversely impact our net revenues, operating income and earnings per share financial measures.

It should be noted that in this footnote, the discussion of impairment of assets including inventories and receivables comes after the discussion of goodwill impairment.  As a quick reminder, US GAAP requires that all impairment considerations such as inventories, accounts receivable and long-lived assets be taken into account before testing goodwill for impairment.

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome!

SEC and PCAOB Issue Statement About Emerging Market Investments

On April 21, 2020, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton, PCAOB Chairman William D. Duhnke III, SEC Chief Accountant Sagar Teotia, SEC Division of Corporation Finance Director William Hinman and SEC Division of Investment Management Director Dalia Blass issued a Public Statement titled “Emerging Market Investments Entail Significant Disclosure, Financial Reporting and Other Risks; Remedies are Limited.”

The Statement begins with the observation that over the last several decades U.S. investors have increased their investments in companies based in or with operations in emerging markets.

For companies with emerging markets risks the Statement makes clear that robust disclosure of the specific risks for individual companies is necessary and boilerplate is not adequate:

“In light of both the significance and company-specific nature of the risks discussed in this statement, we expect issuers to present these risks prominently, in plain English and discuss them with specificity.  Issuers based in emerging markets should consider providing a U.S. domestic investor-oriented comparative discussion of matters such as (1) how the company has met the applicable financial reporting and disclosure obligations, including those related to DCP and ICFR and (2) regulatory enforcement and investor-oriented remedies, including as a practical matter, in the event of a material disclosure violation or fraud or other financial misconduct more generally.”

For investors the Statement addresses the very different risks presented by these investments, focusing on issues including:

  • Emerging Market Risk Disclosures are Important
  • Quality of Financial Information, Requirements and Standards Vary Greatly
  • The PCAOB’s Inability to Inspect Audit Work Papers in China Continues
  • The Ability of U.S. Authorities to Bring Actions in Emerging Markets May Be Limited
  • Shareholders Have Limited Rights and Few Practical Remedies in Emerging Markets
  • Passive Investing Strategies Do Not Take Account of These Risks
  • Investment Advisers, Broker-Dealers and Other Market Participants Should Consider Emerging Market Risks

As always, your thoughts and comments are welcome.