{"id":415,"date":"2015-07-09T14:06:13","date_gmt":"2015-07-09T14:06:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/seci.wpenginepowered.com\/?p=415"},"modified":"2015-07-09T14:06:13","modified_gmt":"2015-07-09T14:06:13","slug":"a-bit-of-perspective-about-clawbacks-in-the-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/a-bit-of-perspective-about-clawbacks-in-the-news\/","title":{"rendered":"A Bit of Perspective about Clawbacks in the News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you are involved in SEC reporting, you have likely been hearing about clawbacks of executive compensation. The SEC, as required by Dodd\/Frank, has proposed a new rule about clawbacks. You can see the SEC\u2019s press release about the proposed rule at:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sec.gov\/news\/pressrelease\/2015-136.html\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">www.sec.gov\/news\/pressrelease\/2015-136.html<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The press release also has a good summary of the proposal and a link to the text of the proposed rule. (The link is near the top of the press release on the right side of the page.)<\/p>\n<p>This rule proposal has created a fair amount of commentary and discussion, as anyone would expect.<\/p>\n<p>That said, courtesy of <strong>Section 304 of SOX<\/strong>, clawbacks have been in play before this proposed rule. And this SOX provision has some teeth. Diebold Corporation, in the wake of a settled accounting fraud enforcement action, was required to clawback compensation from its CEO. Here is an interesting quote from the press release announcing the various enforcements:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe complaint does not allege that (the CEO) engaged in the fraud.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>You can read the release at:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sec.gov\/litigation\/litreleases\/2010\/lr21543.htm\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">www.sec.gov\/litigation\/litreleases\/2010\/lr21543.htm<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>So, what is the reason that Dodd\/Frank requires more rule making about clawbacks? One of the principal differences concerning clawbacks between Dodd\/Frank and SOX is that SOX requires clawbacks when a restatement arises from accounting fraud.<\/p>\n<p>Dodd\/Frank moves things to a higher level because it will require clawbacks for <strong>any material restatement, regardless of cause<\/strong>. So even an unintentional error will trigger a clawback requirement.<\/p>\n<p>In a sense, this is a bit like the SOX whistleblower hotline compared to the Dodd\/Frank whistleblower hotline. SOX requires an anonymous hotline to the audit committee, Dodd\/Frank goes a step further and created the anonymous hotline directly to the SEC.<\/p>\n<p>As always, your thoughts and reactions are welcome!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you are involved in SEC reporting, you have likely been hearing about clawbacks of executive compensation. The SEC, as required by Dodd\/Frank, has proposed a new rule about clawbacks. You can see the SEC\u2019s press release about the proposed rule at: www.sec.gov\/news\/pressrelease\/2015-136.html The press release also has a good summary of the proposal and &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/a-bit-of-perspective-about-clawbacks-in-the-news\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A Bit of Perspective about Clawbacks in the News<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[48,32,77,79,78,58,42,62,4,6,5,61],"coauthors":[163],"class_list":["post-415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-accounting","tag-audit","tag-ceo","tag-clawbacks","tag-doddfrank","tag-finance","tag-financial-reporting","tag-fraud","tag-sec","tag-sec-professionals","tag-sec-reporting","tag-whistleblower"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=415"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/seciblog.pli.edu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}